Our Founding Fathers, “Merchants of Customer Service,” in 1787, drafted a constitutional receipt of non-diversity and non-equity with the inclusion of “the whole number of free persons,” while excluding “three fifths of all other persons” and Indians, and authorized “domestic institutions,” slavery, “in America,” as the “supreme law of the land” under Article VI. Moreover, this constitutional document prohibited our United States government from legislating their congressional duty in five ways:
- The writing, signing, and enforcement of laws that would declare acts of congressional law, its policies, regulations, and procedures, “…prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight…” to be unconstitutional under Article V and Article I, Sec. 9, Clauses 1, 4.
- The Declaration of Slavery Unconstitutional under Article I, Sec. 9, Clause 3 and Sec. 10 of the same article.
- The Declaration of “three fifths of all other persons” to be made whole persons and a free people under Article I, Sec. 2, Clause 3 and the XIV Amendment, Sec. 2.
- The U.S. Constitution prohibited the Judiciary Branch under (Article V) from applying “judicial review” in Marbury v. Madison, a decision which held courts can use tests to determine the constitutionality of law.
- The inclusion of women and their right to vote under the XV Amendment — this is an example of what happens when we fail to amend the Constitution as a whole document when there is one pending issue: We could have amended the XV Amendment to include “sex,” and the XIX Amendment could have been reserved for the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) — just like the XIII Amendment was originally reserved for TONA (Title of Nobility Amendment), which was proposed but then passed as part of the Reconstruction Amendments which abolished slavery.
These “privileges,” however, were enumerated in the Constitution but not federally protected, recognized, and enforced.
These articles, amendments, ambiguous provisions, and conflicting clauses indubitably created a doctrine of “white privilege” for the white supremacist when our Founding Fathers drafted the United States Constitution in 1787.
Nonetheless, the harmful effects of the U.S. Constitution weren't established when it was written and drafted; the harm, injury, and death the American people would sustain would occur before, during, and after the document was signed.
We know the U.S. Constitution established the government, structured a bicameral system of checks and balances, established its principles of democracy, freedom, and American citizenship.
We know the U.S. Constitution authorized “domestic institutions,” slavery in America; it established freedoms, rights, and privileges of races for different “people, person, and citizen.” It also allowed the development of systemic oppression and the production of racism to occur in institutions, policies, practices, and procedures. These structures enveloped a false sense of privilege and degradation within the spirit of the American people — an inherent power of dissension that emasculated the common decency of the human condition. This breakdown of decency made it difficult to address grievances with “the policies” before protesting people of color, sex and gender discrimination, and the exclusion of indigenous peoples and communities. This system of oppression has unfortunately ordained the inaccessibility of human rights to be a constitutional disability. Therefore, the American people could not think to act on petitioning their government to address grievances against the laws, its rules, and policies — “the problem” [not the “people, person, and citizen”] — that the United States government created.
Quote:
“People, Person and Citizen” are neither responsible nor accountable to the U.S. Constitution, state government, and fellow citizens, and that “We the People” are only benefactors of freedom, rights, and privileges.
This is the problem.
Dwayne Arthur Jones